The effects of acute transplantation of allogeneic MSCs derived from bone marrow in severe spinal cord injury generated by clip compression model were evaluated by the clinical, electrophysiological, histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis in this study. Survival rate of the cases which had received MSCs were higher on the 21th day. The rate of hematuria and SEP score were promising for using MSCs in SCI.
The clip compression model was first developed by Rivlin and Tator 31 to create experimental spinal trauma in rats using an aneurysm clip, and it generates both contusion and compression injury in spinal cord, by this way the injury created by the clip compression can mimic the vertebral fracture/luxation and Hansen type-І disc disease. In this study, clinical examination on the first day after trauma showed that all subjects had a BBB score of 0 or 1, and this revealed that the created injury is a severe, reproducible and standard. The clinical unimprovement of the control cases represents the repeatable irreversible damage (physical transection) to the spinal cord.
Several methods have been used in the evaluation of functional improvement after experimental SCI in rats, but the most common method is BBB scale 19,32. Small gain in spinal cord injury is appreciative by the patient, owner and also investigators because of its poor prognosis. In some studies, it was shown that progression of the locomotor function could have occurred in the mildly or moderately traumatized rats within 3 to 7 days after spinal cord trauma, even if no treatment is applied 18,19,21. Absence of any clue for the clinical improvement of control cases presented here on the 1, 3 and 7 th day can be explained by the severity of injury and ascendens and/or descendens degeneration.
There are many studies showing that MSCs therapy improves the BBB score when compared with control groups 18,19,21,33,34. In contrast, Park et al. 20 found that intraparenchymal injection of human MSCs nine days after the moderate spinal cord injury created via a weight dropping method can reduce inflammation but not enough to improve locomotor function and neurogenic bladder. In the present study, the post-injury BBB score did not improve both in MSCs transplanted and not transplanted rats, except 5 rats in the transplantation groups (3 in G3 and 2 in G5). This may show that the injury created with an aneurysm clip with 70 g closure force is a very severe injury and BM-MSCs transplantation in the early acute stage of the very severe SCI cannot provide a functional improvement, even though some improvement was recorded in some individuals.
Even though there was no study investigating the direct effect of MSC transplantation on survival rate of the subjected animals after SCI. Yazdani et al. 13 reported lesser mortality rate, better hygiene and health conditions in the rats treated with neuron-induced BM-MSCs or OECs than the control groups. In an another study about the effects of intraparenchymal transplantation of OCT, MVD, and OCT-MCT seven days after spinal cord injury were investigated, highest weight loss in the control groups was reported 33. In this study, the rate of the rat which could complete the experiment period in the G5 was 60%, in the G1-21 group it was 5.88% and the difference was statistically significant. In our study, same person (PC) applied all stages of the experiment; there was no change in the environmental factors of animals such as housing, feeding and water, and that the only difference between the two groups was MSCs transplantation, so it was thought that this is not an incidental finding and MSCs may provide a positive effect on survival. In addition, this positive effect may be related with MSCs, based on the observations that the rats in the treatment groups had better food-water intake, better hygiene and less hematuria. Although it was not investigated in detail by the present study, it was thought BM-MSCs has a systemic effect via the secreted cytokines and neuroprotective factors, and immunomodulation, thus positively affects general health status and survival. More detailed experimental studies which focused on the effects of MSCs on survival rate after spinal cord injury are needed to clarify if there is a positive correlation between the MSCs transplantation and longer survival rate of the subjects.
The neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury is a major problem in human beings and animals; lower urinary tract inflammation or infection can lead to hematuria and ascendants nephritis. Park et al. 20 reported that there was no difference in terms of bladder volume and urodynamic measurements between the groups treated with stem cells and those who did not after spinal cord trauma, but no data on hematuria ratios were reported. Herein, hematuria rates were lower in stem cell-treated groups compared to control groups, and this was thought to be associated with the anti-inflammatory effect of the MSCs.
Somatosensory evoked potentials can also be used as ancillary test for determining functional integrity of spinal cord after injury 5,18,30,32,33,35. Sirin et al.’s 30 modified scale was used in the presented study for the qualitative evaluation of the injury potentials in post-traumatic SEP recordings. When the control groups were compared with the treatment groups, the rostral SEP scores were found higher in the treatment groups and the difference was statistically significant, while the difference in the caudal SEP score was not significant. In a study, the useful effect of the MSCs on the SEP latencies was reported, but in the same study authors showed no positive effect on the SEP amplitudes 18. Although the latency and amplitude of SEP was not measured in this study, better results according to Sirin et al.’s modified scale 30 were recorded in the treatment groups compared to control groups. Our study results showed that intraparenchymal transplantation of BM-MSCs in the acute phase of the SCI has a positive effect on SEP.
Histopathologic examinations revealed extensive necrotic areas and accompanying inflammatory cell infiltrations in both groups. There was no difference between the control and treatment groups according to histopathologic examination, and the severity of the inflammation, necrosis or other histopathologic changes were similar. It should be noted here that the injury created in this study was severe and extensive necrotic areas were prominent in the sampled spinal cord segments (T9-T10).
In conclusion, even though the intraparenchymal transplantation of BM-MSCs in the acute phase of the SCI can provide some useful effects to hematuria rate, SEP scores and survival time, we have not shown the functional recovery after severe spinal cord injury in this study. The results of this study found initiative to plan further studies for clarifying the role of MSCs in different degree of SCI.