[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat University Medical Journal of Health SciencesFırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Tıp Dergisi
2025, Cilt 39, Sayı 1, Sayfa(lar) 039-043
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
Prostat Adenokarsinomunda WT1 ve E-cadherin Ekspresyonlarının Eş Zamanlı Değerlendirilmesi
Tuba DEVRİM
Izmir Bakırcay University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Pathology, Izmir – TURKIYE
Anahtar Kelimeler: WT1, E-cadherin, prostat adenokarsinomu, yüksek dereceli prostat intraepitelyal neoplazi, benign prostat hiperplazisi
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışmada benign prostat hiperplazisi (BPH), yüksek dereceli prostat intraepitelyal neoplazisi (HGPIN) ve prostat asiner adenokarsinomunda (PAC) WT1 ve E-cadherin ekspresyonlarının eş zamanlı değerlendirilmesi ve bu potansiyel belirteçlerin klinikopatolojik parametrelerle ilişkilerinin analiz edilmesi amaçlandı.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 38 PAC, 10 HGPIN ve 12 iyi huylu BPH dokusuna ait 60 olgu dahil edildi. E-cadherin ve WT1 boyamaları immünohistokimyasal yöntemle uygulandı.

Bulgular: PAC grubunda, BPH ile karşılaştırıldığında WT1 ekspresyonunda anlamlı bir artış belirlendi (p<0.01). E-cadherin düzeyleri PAC grubunda BHP ile karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı bir şekilde azaldı (p<0.05). PAC'de HGPIN'e kıyasla E-cadherin ekspresyonu (p<0.001) azaldı ve WT1 ekspresyonu (p<0.05) arttı. Ancak HGPIN ile BPH arasında anlamlı bir ilişki (p>0.05) saptanmadı. Ayrıca Gleason skoru ile E-cadherin ve WT1 ekspresyonları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptandı (p<0.05). E-cadherin ekspresyonu ile pT arasında da anlamlı bir ilişki saptandı (p<0.05). Her iki belirteç ile perinöral, lenfovasküler ve ekstraprostatik invazyonlar arasında anlamlı bir korelasyon saptanmadı (p>0.05). Ayrıca PAC'de E-cadherin ile WT1 arasında negatif bir korelasyon bulundu (r=-0,341; p=0.008).

Sonuç: Tüm veriler birlikte değerlendirildiğinde PAC epitel hücrelerinde eksprese edilen WT1'in E-cadherin’i baskılayıp PAC'nin ilerlemesini destekleyebileceği sonucuna varıldı.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Giriş
    Prostate acinar adenocarcinoma, (PAC), one of the most common malignancies of the urogenital tract and more common in older men, affects more than 200.000 men per year. PAC, the second most lethal cause of cancer among men, also shows significant prognosis differences among individuals. Therefore, it is important to determine the mechanisms that regulate the progression of PAC 1,2. It is reported that the main cause of morbidity and mortality due to PAC is due to metastasis. Metastasis, which occurs at the stage after the initial neoplastic transformation of cells, involves a series of sequential steps including neoangiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis and entry into the systemic vascular system or lymphatics 3.

    E-cadherin is a cell adhesion molecule that determines epithelial development in the embryo and maintains the differentiated epithelial pattern in the adult. Decreased E-cadherin expression has been reported to be associated with PAC progression 4. E-cadherin expression is also used to indicate the epithelial phenotype, and loss of its expression suggests epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT triggers tumor metastasis. EMT disruption can be demonstrated by loss of E-cadherin expression. However, the mechanisms associated with the exit from EMT are not well understood at present 5. Loss of E-cadherin expression is associated with increased migration and invasiveness of many cancer cells, including prostate 6.

    Wilms tumor antigen 1 (WT1) is a transcription factor overexpressed in some leukemias and solid tumors. There is limited information on the expression and immunogenicity of WT1 in prostate cancer 7. Immunohistological studies of PAC cell lines have shown that WT1 protein expression is cytoplasmic. This suggests that the function of WT1 in prostate tumors may extend beyond the role of a transcription factor to post-transcriptional or translational modulations in the cell 2. It has been reported that WT1 can promote metastatic disease, suppress E-cadherin, and increase the motility of PAC cells with low migration and metastatic potential 8. Therefore, WT1 in prostate cancer may function as a novel oncogene facilitating the development of a lethal metastatic phenotype 6. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between E-cadherin and WT1 proteins expressed in tissue samples from PAC cases and their relationships with histopathological data and prognosis.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Materyal ve Metot
    Research and Publication Ethics: Ethical approval was obtained from the Kirikkale University Non-invasive Research Ethics Committee (2019.07.02).

    A total of 38 primary PAC, 10 high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and 12 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissues were included in this study. Histopathological samples were obtained from 29 radical prostatectomy (RP) and 9 transurethral resection (TUR) or suprapupic prostatectomy materials. HGPIN areas were obtained from PAC samples. Histopathological evaluation was performed on hematoxylin eosin (H&E) stained slides of PAC cases, and Gleason grading and scoring were performed according to the modified Gleason scoring system of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP). Vascular and perineural invasion, HGPIN, and the presence or absence of extraprostatic invasion were also recorded in RP cases. In addition, the pT stages of RP cases were evaluated according to the TNM system. pT2 cases were collected in a single group for statistical analysis.

    The preparations that best represented the tumor were selected and immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin (clone EP700Y; Rabbit Monoclonal) and WT1 (clone 6F-H2; Mouse Monoclonal) was performed using an automatic immunostaining device (Benchmark ULTRA, Ventana® Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). Kidney tissue was used as a positive control for WT1, and breast tissue was used as a positive control for e-cadherin. Scoring for E-cadherin expression was performed according to the presence and strength of membranous staining in each sample (absent: 0, weak membranous staining: 1 and strong membranous staining: 2); and for WT1, according to the presence of cytoplasmic positive staining (no staining: 0, staining: 1).

    Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software program (SPSS 20.0 Inc., Chicago, IL). The relationship between the results and clinicopathological parameters was evaluated using the Chi-square test. The significance of expression levels was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences in expression between groups were examined using the Mann-Whitney U test. A 95% confidence interval (p<0.05) was considered significant.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Bulgular
    Clinicopathological features of the patients are summarized in Table 1. As to WT1, all BPH and HGPIN groups were scored as 0, and 39.5% of the PAC group was detected as score 1. Regarding E-cadherin, 41.7% of BPH was detected as a score of 2, 70% of HGPIN was a score of 1, and 52.6% of PAC was a score of 0 (Figure 1, Table 2).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 1: Clinicopathological features of the PAC group.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Figure 1: Histopathological images (x200). Hematoxilen-Eosin Staining (A: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, B: Prostate acinar adenocarcinoma Gleason Score 3+3, C: Prostate acinar adenocarcinoma Gleason Score 4+4), E-cadherin Immunohistochemical Staining (D: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, E: Prostate acinar adenocarcinoma Gleason Score 3+3, F: Prostate acinar adenocarcinoma Gleason Score 4+4), and WT1

    Immunohistochemical Staining (G: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, H: Prostate acinar adenocarcinoma Gleason Score 3+3, I: Prostate acinar adenocarcinoma Gleason Score 4+4).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 2: Distribution of study groups according to WT1 and E-cadherin scores

    E-cadherin expression was significantly increased in the BPH group compared to the PAC group (p<0.05). A significant decrease in E-cadherin expression was detected (p<0.001) when the PAC group was compared to the HGPIN group (Table 3). In contrast, WT1 expression was significantly higher in the PAC group compared to the BPH group (p<0.01). The PAC group also showed an increase in WT1 expression (p<0.05) compared to the HGPIN group (Table 4). Significant correlations were found between the Gleason score and both E-cadherin and WT1 expressions (p<0.05) and between E-cadherin expression and the pT stage (p<0.05). A negative correlation was also determined between E-cadherin and WT1 in PAC (r=-0.341; p=0.008). No significant difference was observed between HGPIN and BPH with either marker (p>0.05). There was also no significant relation between the clinicopathological markers (p>0.05).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 3: Distribution of clinicopathological parameters in prostate aciner adenocarcinoma according to E-cadherin score


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 4: Distribution of clinicopathological parameters in prostate aciner adenocarcinoma according to WT1 score.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Tartışma
    In the present study, we provided evidence for increased WT1 levels and decreased E-cadherin levels in PAC cells. We also observed an inverse relationship between WT1 and E-cadherin immunohistochemistry levels in the tumor tissue. It was understood that there was an increase in WT1 and a decrease in E-cadherin levels with the progression from HGPIN to PAC in tumor progression. It was reported that the upregulation of WT1 provides an experimental basis for clinically targeted therapy of cervical cancer by suppressing cervical cancer development via miR-205 9. On the other hand, complex interactions have been identified between WT1 and IGFBP1, FBN1, SERPINA1, and 20 other genes, and it has been reported that WT1 has a new therapeutic potential in ovarian cancer 10. Another study in ovarian carcinoma revealed that WT1 plays a tumor-supporting role and increases EMT through negative modulation of ERK1/2 signaling and E-cadherin expression, and it was reported that WT1 may be a new therapeutic target that can improve the prognosis of ovarian carcinoma 11.

    Many studies have evaluated the clinical significance of EMT markers at various stages of human PAC. Loss of E-cadherin staining in PAC has been reported to be associated with higher Gleason score, advanced clinical stage, and poor prognosis 12. E-cadherin expression is used to monitor the epithelial phenotype, and its loss suggests EMT 13. WT1 has been reported to be required for suppression of the epithelial phenotype during embryonic stem cell differentiation through direct transcriptional regulation of E-cadherin-related genes of EMT 14. These new insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating EMT may help in the development of cell-based therapies.

    In recent years, new grade groups and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage groups have been used to predict prognosis 1. Although pathological stage seems to be one of the best prognostic factors available to date, the value of the degree of disease and clinical stage is controversial. In this study, E-cadherin immunostaining was associated with Gleason score and tumor grade, in line with the literature (Bengallo et al., 2016). However, unlike literature, significant associations were also found between E-cadherin expression and tumor stage and perineural invasion 15. Methods that allow more accurate prediction of clinical behavior are urgently needed. In this regard, investigating alternative molecular prognostic markers is now attracting significant attention.

    It has been reported that E-cadherin suppresses in vitro invasion and the presence of E-cadherin staining in tumor tissue is associated with longer overall survival 16. Loss of E-cadherin has also been shown to reduce metastatic potential in invasive ductal carcinomas 17. In an overview of all data obtained, the findings suggest that E-cadherin plays opposing roles in tumor progression by suppressing cancer cell invasion.

    E-cadherin, an important gene in epithelial differentiation and neoplastic transformation, represents a downstream target gene that links the roles of WT1 in differentiation and growth control 18. WT1 expression transcriptionally regulates the expression of growth control genes. WT1 is reported to be expressed in PAC epithelial cells and regulates PAC critical genes. There are reports that WT1 may also promote metastasis and suppress E-cadherin. It is reported that WT1 may activate angiogenesis in PAC cells to increase tumor growth and progression to metastatic disease 19. In this study, WT1 was not associated with the advanced pathological tumor stage. Considering the potential of WT1 to promote PAC invasion, it was evaluated that it may affect genes that promote PAC progression. Thus, it was concluded that therapies targeting WT1 in PAC may reduce metastatic spread and increase overall survival.

    Consequently, it was thought that WT1 expressed in PAC epithelial cells suppresses E-cadherin and promotes progression to more advanced pathological stages, thus increasing the poor prognosis of PAC cells. It could be suggested that the potential of WT1 to promote PAC cell migration may be realized by regulating genes that stimulate the aggressive behavior of PAC.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Kaynaklar

    1) Yılmaz A, Bilici M, Tekin SB. Survival analysis and prognostic factors in prostate cancer patients: A single center experience in eastern anatolia. Dicle Tip Dergisi 2020; 47(4):796-805.

    2) Reese J, Brown K, Magi-Galluzzi C, Fraizer G. The role of WT1 in prostate cancer progression. Cancer Research 2008; 68.

    3) Arya M, Bott SR, Shergill IS, et al. The metastatic cascade in prostate cancer. Surg Oncol 2006; 15(3):117-128.

    4) Rubin MA, Mucci NR, Figurski J, et al. E-cadherin expression in prostate cancer: A broad survey using high-density tissue microarray technology. Hum Pathol 2001; 32(7): 690-697.

    5) Putzke AP, Ventura AP, Bailey AM, et al. Metastatic progression of prostate cancer and E-Cadherin: regulation by Zeb1 and Src family kinases. The American Journal of Pathology 2011; 179.

    6) Brett-Morris A, Pandey S, Fraizer G. The Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) regulates E-cadherin expression and migration of prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer 2013; 12:3.

    7) King J. Evaluating the Wilms’ tumour antigen 1 as a target for the immunotherapy of prostate cancer Tumor. Brisbane (AU): Codon Publications 2016; 14: 34-40

    8) Fraizer GC, Eisermann K, Brett-Morris A, et al. Functional role of WT1 in prostate cancer. In Wilms Tumor 2016; 235-259.

    9) Luo H, Zhang J, He Z, Wu S. Long noncoding RNA WT1-AS inhibits the progression of cervical cancer by sponging miR-205. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2021; 36(6): 491-500.

    10) Meng K, Cao J, Dong Y, et al. Application of bioinformatics analysis to identify important pathways and Hub genes in ovarian cancer affected by WT1. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9: 741051.

    11) Han Y, Song C, Zhang T, et al. Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) promotes ovarian cancer progression by regulating E-cadherin and ERK1/2 signaling. Cell Cycle 2020; 19(20): 2662-2675.

    12) Whiteland H, Spencer-Harty S, Thomas DH, et al. Putative prognostic epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition biomarkers for aggressive prostate cancer. Experimental and Molecular Pathology 2013; 95(2): 220-226.

    13) Putzke AP, Ventura AP, Bailey AM, et al. Metastatic progression of prostate cancer and E-cadherin: Regulation by ZEB1 and Src family kinases. American Journal of Pathology 2011; 179(1): 400-410.

    14) Martínez-Estrada O, Lettice L, Essafi A, et al. Wt1 is required for cardiovascular progenitor cell formation through transcriptional control of Snail and E-cadherin. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 89-93.

    15) Bengallol T, El-Faitori O, Sassi S, et al. Expression of E-cadherin in prostatic carcinoma: Prognostic significance. Journal of Cancer Prevention & Current Research 2016; 4(3) :83-87.

    16) Figiel S, Vasseur C, Bruyere F, Rozet F, Maheo K, Fromont G. Clinical significance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in prostate cancer, Human Pathology 2017; 61: 26-32.

    17) Padmanaban V, Krol I, Suhail Y, et al. E-cadherin is required for metastasis in multiple models of breast cancer. Nature 2019; 573: 439-444.

    18) Hosono S, Gross I, English MA, et al. E-cadherin is a WT1 target gene. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(15):10943-10953.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
    [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]