[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat University Medical Journal of Health Sciences
2025, Cilt 39, Sayı 3, Sayfa(lar) 240-245
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
Künt Oküler Travmada Optik Kohorens Tomografi Değişikliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi
Burcu IŞIK1, Emre AYINTAP2
1İncirli Medvita Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, İstanbul, TÜRKİYE
2İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, TÜRKİYE
Anahtar Kelimeler: Optik koherens tomografi, göz yaralanması, künt göz travması
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışma, optik koherens tomografinin (OKT) künt travmalı hastaların tanı ve takibindeki önemini ve oftalmolojik muayeneye önemli bir yardımcı olarak kullanılabilirliğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya künt oküler travmaya maruz kalmış 30 hastanın 60 gözü dahil edildi. Künt oküler travmaya maruz kalan göz çalışma grubuna, hastanın diğer sağlıklı gözü ise kontrol grubuna dahil edildi. İlk oftalmolojik muayenede en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (LogMar), göz içi basınçları (goldman aplanasyon tonometrisi), ön segment ve fundus muayenesi yapıldı. Ön segment ve makula OKT ile tarandı.

Bulgular: Künt oküler travmaya maruz kalan 30 hastanın (24 erkek, %80) 60 gözü çalışmaya alındı. En iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği sağlıklı gözlerde 0.10±0.15 bulundu, künt travmadan etkilenen gözlerde ise istatistiksel anlamlı olarak daha kötüydü 0.87±0.39 (p<0,001. Travmadan etkilenen gözlerde göz içi basıncı ortalama değerleri 20.20±5.13 mmHg, sağlıklı gözlerde ise 13.40±3.00 mmHg bulundu (p<0.001). Travmadan etkilenen gözlerde göz içi basıncı istatistiksel olarak daha yüksekti. Santral kornea kalınlığı (SKK) ortalama değerleri etkilenen gözlerde 594±93.10 ve sağlıklı gözlerde 542±42.10 idi (p<0.001). Santral makula kalınlığı (SMK) ortalama değerleri etkilenen gözlerde 221±16.80, sağlıklı gözlerde 220±16.80 idi (p>0.05). Sonuçta, künt travmaya maruz kalan gözlerde SKK ortalama değerleri yüksek bulundu. Ancak ve travmatik ve travmatik olmayan gözler arasında SMK ortalama değerlerinde anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır.

Sonuç: OKT oküler travma hastalarının tanı ve takibinde kullanılan, noninvaziv, kolay uygulanabilir, tekrarlanabilir, yüksek hız ve çözünürlükte bir araçtır. OKT, künt travmaya maruz kalan gözlerde tanımlanamayan değişiklikleri ortaya çıkarmak için daha fazla tercih edilmelidir.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Giriş
    More than 19 million people are exposed to ophtalmic injuries each year worldwide. Even minor ocular injuries are contributed to morbidity and disability1. Oner et al.2 reviewed all the patients who were admitted to the emergency department with eye injuries in two years prospectively and it revealed that half of the patients (48%) had experienced blunt ocular trauma. Blunt ocular trauma can lead to a wide variaty of eye structure changes such as traumatic cataract, retinal and choroidal hemorrhage, corneal abrasion, commotio retinae, traumatic hyphema, traumatic iris defects, retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, traumatic angle recession, subconjunctival hemorrhage, lens dislocation and subluxation1,2.

    Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a speed, cross sectional, non-invasive imaging system in biological systems and commenly preffered in clinical practice for detailed examination of posterior and anterior segment injuries. OCT was first revealed as a new imaging system in 1991 by Huang et al.3 Although OCT was first used to evaluate the posterior segment, after the addition of the anterior segment module ophtalmologists were able to assess deteailed images of anterior segment in 20083-5.

    This study aims to reveal the importance of OCT in diagnosis and follow-up of the patients with ocular blunt trauma, as well as its usability as a substantial adjunct to ophthalmological examination.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Materyal ve Metot
    Research and Publication Ethics: This observational, prospective study adhered to the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Local Ethics Committee of İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital (meeting number:19, decision number: 9, 15 March 2016). Written informed patient consent was obtained from all patients included in this study. The study was conducted between January 2015 and February 2016.

    The patients who were admitted to İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital Emergency Department within the first three days of experiencing blunt eye trauma were included to this study. We have evaluated the structural changes that observed in both anterior and posterior segment due to ocular blunt trauma with the help of OCT. Sixty eyes of 30 patients were enrolled. The eye which was exposed to ocular blunt trauma was included to the study group and the other healthy eye was included to the control group.

    Exclusion criteria were the presence of any other ocular disease; history of any eye surgery, injections or laser teratment, exposure of bilateral eyes to the blunt ocular trauma. Healthy eyes of the patients that were not exposed to the trauma were considered as the control group.

    The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the patients was assesed with using LogMAR (Reichertcompany, Reichert, INC, NY, USA) for the statistical analysis at the initial examination. Intraocular pressures were assesed with Goldmann applanation tonometer. Fundus and anterior segment examination was performed using slit lamp biomicroscope in detail. Structural changes of anterior and posterior segment were recorded with OCT. The anterior segment OCT was performed through the corneal center. Macular OCT was performed as early as possible in case corneal edema may not allow the detailed examination. Same investigator performed the evaluations and measurements. BCVA, macular thickness, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressures of the uninjured and injured eyes of the patients were compared.

    The SPSS 17.0 statistical package program was performed in all analyses and at 95% confidence level (p <0.05 was considered statistically significant). The relationship between the two categorical variables was analyzed with the non-parametric Chi-square. Categorical variables were calculated as the mean and standard deviation The two independent sample averages’ difference was evaluated with the Student’s t-test. The numerical variables’ normal distrubition fit was calculated with the Shapiro Wilk test.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Bulgular
    Sixty eyes of 30 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 29.7±18.5 years (range 9-68 years) in this study. Six (20%) were female and 24 (80%) patients were male.

    Only one eyes of the participants were exposed to ocular blunt trauma. Two (6.7%) patients had corneal lamellar laceration, three (10%) patients had commotio retinea and eight (26.7%) patients had traumatic hyphema (Table 1). None of these diagnosis were simultaneous.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 1: Demographic characteristics

    The causations of injuries were as follows; 33% (n=10) punch on the eye, 30% (n=9) traffic accident, 23% (n=7) falling down from height, 13% (n=4) eye injury caused by bottle cap (Table 2).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 2: Etiology of injuries

    BCVA were 0.87±0.39 in the study group and 0.10±0.15 in the control group. Visual acuity decrease was statistically significant in the study group (p<0.001). Intraocular pressure mean values in the uninjured eyes were 13.40±3.00 mHg, and in the injured eyes were 20.20±5.13 mmHg. Intraocular pressure increase in the injured eyes was statistically significant (p<0.001). The mean corneal thickness values were 594±93.10 μm in injured eyes, and 542±42.10 μm in uninjured eyes. Cental corneal thickness of injured eyes were significantly thicker (p=0.011). The mean values of central macular thickness were 221±16.80 μm in injured eyes, and 220±16.80 μm in uninjured eyes. The difference between the the macular thickness mean values of the two groups was not statistically significant. (p=0.767, Table 3)


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 3: Comparison of measurements in affacted and nonaffected eyes

    17 patients (56.6%) were diagnosed with traumatic hyphema. Eight patients diagnosed with traumatic hyphema who had morphological changes at retina layers also had significant vision loss. These structurel changes are as follow. Five of traumatic hyphema patients had irregular inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) junction in the macula OCT (Figure 1). One of these eight patients had retinal ondulation and separation between Bruch's membrane and retina pigment epithelium (RPE) (Figure 2). While in another patient photoreceptor outer segment hyperreflectivity was detected (Figure 3). RPE seperation at the inferior temporal fovea was observed in another patient (Figure 4).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Figure 1: Irregularity in IS/OS junction in macula OCT image


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Figure 2: The separation between Bruch's membrane and retinal pigment epithelium layers are shown in macula OCT image


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Figure 3: Hyperreflectivity in photoreceptor outer segment is shown in macula OCT image


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Figure 4: Separation of the retinal pigment epithelium at the inferior temporal fovea is dedected in macula OCT image

    Three patients (10%) were diagnosed with commotio retina and two of them had no structural changes in the macula OCT. While one of the commotio retinae patients had irregular IS/OS junction.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Tartışma
    Ocular blunt trauma is a leading cause of preventable visual impairment and bindness worldwide. The most common form of ophtalmic trauma is blunt ocular trauma. The enforcement on the ocular surface is transferred to the posterior segment and results in retinal complications5.

    Adolescents and children are the most affected group by blunt ocular trauma6. In this study male rate was 80% and 72% of the participants were between 11-17 years of age. This is because men spend more time than women in both business and social life, as a result trauma risk increaes for young men who spend more time outside.

    Blunt ocular trauma has four phases are overshooting, compression, decompression and oscillations7,8. Anterior segment is often more affected compared to posterior segment and hyphema is one of the most common pathologic findings of blunt ocular trauma9. Traumatic hyphema is represented with the sudden vision loss and ophthalmogists often encounter. If complications develop during follow-up or patients have inadequate treatment, visual prognosis may worsen. Visual loss may be the cause of the amblyopia in children and the loss of work in adults9-11. The most common diagnosis due to blunt ocular trauma was traumatic hyphema in this study (56.6% n=17). The other diagnoses were corneal lameller laceration, commotio retina and corneal epithelial defect. Eight patients who weree diagnosed with traumatic hyphema had retinal structural alterations in macular OCT. In addition, none of the patients had permanent blindness.

    At first, ophthalmologists were able to examine only posterior segment by OCT, then 1310 nanometer wavelengths was used and let the anterior segment to be evaluated. With the help of AS-OCT (anterior segment-OCT) lesions that that can not be dedected by the ophthalmologic examination can be revealed in blunt globe trauma patients. AS-OCT is a robust tool to diagnose the injury of ocular surface of traumatic eyes7-10. In this study, central corneal thickness was evaluated with AS-OCT. A significant increase was found in central corneal thickness in injured eyes compared to uninjured eyes. İncrease of corneal thickness was detected in patients with clinically undiagnosed corneal edema. Corneal edema may result with permenant vision decrease, so diagnosis is important.

    OCT is a noninvasive tool with high resolution and speed that can be used to diagnose the alterations due to macular trauma. The structural changes which were not detectable by the clinician's examination can be assesed with the addition of OCT to routine ophtalmologic examination11. In this study, the retina-choroidal junction, retinal layers and central macular thickness, were examined in the posterior segment. In recent studies, macular thickness and retinal volume of injured did not differ from uninjured eyes significantly after trauma7. In accordance with this result, no significant difference was detected in central macular thickness as a result of blunt ocular trauma.

    The commotio retinae (Berlin’s edema) is often releated to blunt eye trauma. The characteristic sign is retinal opacification which usually subsides in a short period12-15. Damage to the the outer layer of the photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium are the possible causes of this opacification. Retinal pigment epithelium and retinal photoreceptor outer segment damage is often observed in OCT images of patients in commotio retinae13,14. In recent studies, transient hyperreflectivity of outer retina that is contributed to mild lesions with better visual prognosis and destruction of inner/outer segment junction (IS/OS), hyperreflectivity of overlying retina were observed that is contributed to severe lessions at the OCT images in commotio retinae11-16. In this study, we detected structural retinal layer alterations in eight patients. One of these eight patients was diagnosed as commotio retinae with fundus examination and had irregular IS/OS junction. Overall, if commotio retinae is the only retinopathy diagnosed during the fundus examination, OCT reveales normal retinal structures or transient abnormalities which are often detected at the RPE complex and IS/OS. OCT may reveal the baseline photoreceptor disruption and ophthalmologists may predict visual outcomes during the follow-up of commotio retinae patients.

    All of the patients with pathological morphological retinal fiber layers also had traumatic hyphema, which may be related to the severity of the trauma.

    Outcomes of this study have shown that OCT scan was able to reveal retinal damage in ocular trauma patients who did not show evident commotio retinae findings in fundus exam.

    This study has some limitations. First of all there was small sample size to conclude concrete suggestions. However, it was consistently observed that there are pathological retinal layer changes in patients with significant vision loss and blunt ocular trauma. Secondly, uninjured eyes in same patients were assigned as control group. However, individual characteristics and differences of patients may effect statistical results and we believe this possible effect would be averted by our method. Thirdly, patients’ follow-up records are not present so we long-term contribution of using OCT in trauma patients could not be evaluated.

    In conclusion, OCT is a noninvasive, easily applicable, repeatable tool with high speed and resolution used for diagnosis and follow-up of the trauma patients. OCT should be more preferred by ophthalmologists to reveal undefined alterations in eyes exposed to blunt trauma.

    Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

    Funding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Kaynaklar

    1) Guly M, Guly HR, Boumara O, Gray RH, Lacky FE. Ocular injuries in patients with major trauma. Emerg Med J 2006;23:915-917

    2) Oner A, Kekec Z, Karakucuk S, Ikizceli I, Sözüer EM. Ocular trauma in Turkey: A 2 year prospective study. Adv Ther 2006;23:274-283.

    3) Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178-1181.

    4) Katkar RA, Tadinada SA, Amaechi BT, Fried D. Optical Coherence Tomography. Dent Clin North Am 2018;62:421-4345.

    5) Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mann L. Epidemiology of blinding trauma in the United States Eye Industry Registry. Ophtalmic Epidemiol 2006;13:209-216.

    6) Ustaoglu M, Karapapak M, Tiryaki S, et. al. Demographic characteristics and visual outcomes of open globe injuries in a tertiary hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020;46:549-556.

    7) Oh J, Jung JH, Moon SW, et al. Commotio retinae with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 2011;31:2044-2049.

    8) Huang J, Liu X, Wu Z, et al. Classification of full-thickness traumatic macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Retina 2009;29:340-348.

    9) Özer Ö, Tuncer ML. Blunt Eye Trauma: Epidemiology, prognostic factors and visual outcome-a 10-year retrospective study. J Craniofac Surg 2023;34:36-38.

    10) Filemonowicz-Skoczek A, Romanowska-Dixon B. The use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in the imaging diagnostics of intracorneal foreign bodies. Folia Med Cracov 2024;64:23-29.

    11) Wylegala E, Dobrowolski D, Nowińska A, Tarnawska D. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography in eye injuries. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009; 247(4):451-455.

    12) Ahn SJ, Woo SJ, Kim KE, Jo DH, Ahn J, Park KH. Optical coherence tomography morphologic grading of macular commotio retinae and its association with anatomic and visual outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:994-1001.

    13) Mansour AM, Gren WR, Hogge C. Histopathology of commotio retinae. Retina 1992;12:24-28.

    14) Sony P, Venkatesh P, Gadaginamath S, Garg SP. Optical coherence tomography findings in commotio retinae. Clin Experiment Ophtalmol 2006;346:621-3. 15. El Matri L, Chebil A, Kort F, Bouraoui R, Largueche L, Mghaieth F. Optical coherence tomography findings in Berlin’s edema. J Ophtalmic Vis Res. 2010;52:127-9.

    16) Itakura H, Kishi S. Restored photoreceptor outer segment in commotio retinae. Ophtalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42:29-31.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
    [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]