Research and Publication Ethics: The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Gaziantep University (approval number: 2014/390, date: 15.12.2014).
Our study is a cross-sectional research, and the data were collected prospectively. In our study, a priori power analysis was performed to detect meaningful differences between groups. With 40 patients and 40 controls, an alpha level of 0.05, and a two-tailed independent samples t-test, the probability of detecting a medium-sized effect (Cohen’s d=0.5) is approximately 80%. After receiving ethical approval, 45 patients who sought treatment at the Psychiatry Clinic of Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine between December 2014 and August 2015 and were diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), along with 43 healthy volunteers, were included. Due to the withdrawal of five patients with schizoaffective disorder and three healthy volunteers, the final sample consisted of 40 healthy controls and 40 patients diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder (total n= 80).
Excluded from the study were individuals outside the age range of 18–65 years, those with any psychiatric disorder other than schizoaffective disorder, those with neurological or systemic diseases, pregnant individuals, those with a history of antioxidant treatment (e.g., vitamin E, vitamin C, and N-acetylcysteine) or xanthine oxidase inhibitors (e.g., allopurinol and folic acid) within the last six months, those with alcohol or drug use in the past six months, and individuals diagnosed with intellectual disability. The healthy control group was selected from individuals attending the hospital for regular annual check-ups, who did not have any medical conditions. To eliminate potential confounding factors that could affect oxidative stress in the control group, specific exclusion criteria were applied. Accordingly, individuals with chronic inflammatory disease, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, a history of acute or chronic infection; those who had used steroids or anti-inflammatory drugs within the past six months; those with tobacco or alcohol dependence; and those with liver or kidney dysfunction were excluded from the control group. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians.
Data Collection Tools
Sociodemographic and Clinical Data Form: This semi-structured form, prepared by the researchers, included sociodemographic information, disease duration, medical history, mental status examination, and diagnosis according to the DSM-5 criteria.
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI): This scale was designed to monitor the progression of psychiatric disorders across all age groups within the context of clinical research. It comprises three items that measure the overall severity of the illness or the degree of symptomatic improvement 16.
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): This semi-structured interview tool consists of 30 items, each rated on a seven-point severity scale. This scale includes seven items targeting positive symptoms, seven items focusing on negative symptoms, and 16 items addressing general psychopathology. The seven-point rating for each question reflects increasing levels of psychopathology 17. The reliability and validity analyses of the Turkish version of the scale were undertaken by Kostakoğlu et al. 18.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D): This is a clinician-administered scale used to measure the severity and variation of depression levels, but it is not diagnostic. It consists of 17 items 19. The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version was conducted by Akdemir et al. 20.
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS): This interviewer-administered scale is designed to measure the severity and variation of manic states. It consists of a total of 11 items, with the last week being the focus of evaluation. The clinician’s judgment holds more weight than the patient’s statements 21. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Karadağ et al. 22.
Sample collection and laboratory measurements: Blood samples from both the patient and control groups were collected from the antecubital vein around 8 a.m., following at least 12 hours of overnight fasting. This time slot was selected to minimize circadian variations in daily hormone and metabolite levels and to ensure the standardization of measurements. After a 12-hour fasting period, blood samples were taken from the antecubital vein of both patients diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and the control group. The blood was transferred into gel tubes and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 minutes within six hours, and the serum was separated. The serum samples were stored at -80°C for the analysis of TAS, TOS, and PRDX1. Serum TAS (mmol Trolox equiv./L), TOS (µmol H₂O₂ equiv./L), and PRX-1 (ng/mL) levels were measured in the Biochemistry Laboratory of Gaziantep University, and OSI was subsequently calculated.
Serum TOS and TAS levels were determined using an automatic measurement method developed by Erel, with fully automated oxidative stress kits from Rel Assay Diagnostics and the Tokyo Boeki Prestige I24 autoanalyzer. OSI was calculated by dividing TOS levels by TAS levels. Peroxiredoxin serum levels for both the patients and controls were measured at 450 nm using a Yehua (China) human enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions, at the Biochemistry Department of Gaziantep University.
Statistical analysis: The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was utilized to assess the normality of variable distributions. For categorical parametric variables, the chi-square test was applied, while parametric continuous variables were analyzed using the t-test. To compare two or more independent groups with non-parametric data, the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were employed. Correlations between quantitative data were evaluated with Spearman’s correlation test. Results were expressed as mean and standard deviation values for parametric variables and median (minimum–maximum) values for non-parametric variables. SPSS version 22.0 software was used for statistical analyses. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.