[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat University Medical Journal of Health Sciences
2026, Cilt 40, Sayı 1, Sayfa(lar) 084-092
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
İç Anadolu Bölgesi Aeroallerjen Duyarlılık Paterni ve COVİD-19 Pandemisinin Bu Patern Üzerine Etkileri
Bahar ARSLAN1, Neslihan CERRAH DEMİR1, Murat TÜRK2
1Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Department of Allergy and Immunology Kayseri, TÜRKİYE
2Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine Department of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology Kayseri, TÜRKİYE
Anahtar Kelimeler: Aeroallerjen, alerjik rinit, duyarlanma, COVID 19
Özet
Amaç: Alerjen duyarlılık paternleri etnik kökene ve coğrafyaya göre değişir; bu nedenle alerjik hastalıklar üzerindeki etkileri muhtemelen bölgeseldir.

Bu çalışmada, bölgemizin mevcut alerjen duyarlılığını belirleyerek tedavinin düzenlenmesine ve koruyucu önlemlere katkıda bulunmayı ve COVİD 19’un duyarlılık üzerine etkisini araştırmayı amaçladık.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza 2021-2025 yılları arasında hastanemiz immünoloji ve alerji polikliniğine alerjik rinit semptomları ile başvuran ve deri prik testi yapılıp en az bir aeroalerjen duyarlılığı tespit edilmiş olan hastalar dahil edildi. Deri testinde öncelikle ön kola alerjen özütü damlaları uygulanır deri özel bir lansetle (Heinz Herenz Hamburg, Almanya) delinerek incelenir. Standardize edilmiş alerjen özleri içeren ve alerjenik etkinliği kanıtlanmış Lofarma Aeroallerjen Aşısı kullanıldı.

Bulgular: Tüm bireyler dikkate alındığında iç-ortam alerjen sıklığı 78.3% iken dış-ortam alerjen sıklığı 57.6% olarak belirlendi. Tüm alerjenler içinde en sık gözlenen aeroallerjenlerin ev tozu akarı ve çim poleni (dermatophagoides farinae (n=1135,49.8%), dermatophagoides pterynossinus (n=1095, 48.1%) ve çim poleni (grass) (n=1482,50.2%) olduğu ve bu alerjenlere duyarlanma oranının birbirine benzer olduğu gözlendi. Dış-ortam alerjen sıklığının özellikle çim poleni (grass) n, yabani ot ve zeytin ağacı poleninin 2024 yılında diğer yıllardan anlamlı düzeyde daha düşük olduğu gözlendi. Kedi alerjen sıklığı 2021 yılında diğer üç yıla göre anlamlı düzeyde düşüktü (p=0.036).

Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonucunda İç Anadolu bölgesinde iç-ortam duyarlığının dış ortam duyarlığından daha fazla olduğunu, iç-ortam alerjenlerden en sık ev tozu akarı (df), dış ortam alerjenlerden ise en sık çim poleni duyarlanmasının olduğunu gösterdik. Yıllar içindeki dağılıma baktığımız zaman kedi alerjisinin özellikle COVID 19 sonrası dönemde arttığını gözlemledik. Bulgularımızın çeşitliliği bölgesel duyarlanma farklılıklarına göre aeroalerjenlerden korunma önlemlerinin geliştirilebileceğini düşündürmektedir.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Giriş
    Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common form of noninfectious rhinitis, causing symptoms such as nasal discharge, congestion, itching, and sneezing, affecting 10-30% of all adults and 40% of children. The immunopathogenesis of allergic rhinitis involves both immediate and late-type immune responses resulting from specific immunoglobulin E antibody-mediated hypersensitivity to aeroallergens that are tolerated by normal individuals 1. Aeroallergen causing AR can include outdoor pollens (including tree, grass, and weeds, as well as ambrosia), molds, and indoor aeroallergens (e.g., house dust mites, animals, and molds) 2.

    Aeroallergen sensitization patterns vary by ethnicity and geography; therefore, their impact on allergic diseases is likely regional 3. In Europe, the major aeroallergens are pollens. In tropical regions, the main aeroallergen is house dust mites 4,5. Initial studies in our country evaluated pollen as the most common aeroallergen 6. Studies in the Marmara and Eastern Black Sea regions, including pediatric patients diagnosed with asthma and AR, was found house dust mite sensitivity as the most common in all diagnostic groups 7. Another study in the Aegean region identified weeds (54%), grass pollens (45%), olive pollen (44%), and house dust mites (38%) as the most common aeroallergens 8. A previous study in the Develi district of Kayseri province, covering both pediatric and adult age groups, showed that the most common aeroallergens were a mixture of pollens, followed by Dermatophagoides pterynossinus (dp), Bermuda grass, and olive tree pollen. House dust mite allergy is more common in patients with perennial AR; Pollen sensitivity has been found to be more common in patients with seasonal AR 9.

    However, there are no data demonstrating the distribution of aeroallergens in Central Anatolia in the adult age group, nor are there data demonstrating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the current aeroallergen profile.

    In this study, we aimed to determine the current aeroallergen sensitivity in our region, contribute to the development of treatment and preventive measures, and investigate the impact of COVID-19 on this situation.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Materyal ve Metot
    Research and Publication Ethics: Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital (Date: 26/09/2025, No: 597).

    This retrospective study complied fully with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to its retrospective nature, the ethics committee exempted the study from requiring informed consent from patients.

    Patients who presented to the immunology and allergy outpatient clinic of our hospital between 2021 and 2025 with symptoms of allergic rhinitis and who were diagnosed with at least one aeroallergen sensitization via skin prick testing were included in this study. Age <18 years old and sensitization without symptoms were among exclusion criteria. As our hospital is one of the referral centers in allergy and immunology in Central Anatolia, patients from Kayseri, Kırşehir, Nevşehir, Yozgat, Niğde, Sivas, and Aksaray were included.

    Demographic data, skin prick test results, and medical records of the patients were retrospectively reviewed.

    Skin Prick Test: Skin prick testing was performed routinely by applying aeroallergen extract drops to the forearm, followed by pricking with a special lancet (Heinz Herenz Hamburg, Germany).

    Standardized aeroallergen extracts with proven aeroallergenic activity (Lofarma Aeroallergen Vaccine, Lofarma S.p.A., Milan, Italy) were used. A minimum distance of 2 cm was maintained between different aeroallergen extracts. At 20 minutes, an induration size ≥3 mm greater than that of the negative control was considered positive. All skin prick tests were performed by qualified technicians.

    Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation [SD], counts, and percentages).

    Normality of sensitization wheal sizes was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and non-normal distributions were confirmed. Relationships between aeroallergen frequency and year, month, sex, and COVID-19 period (before vs. after) were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test. Since many aeroallergens were examined together, the Benjamini-Hochberg (False Discovery Rate, FDR) method was used to eliminate multiple comparison errors. Comparisons of sensitization wheal sizes among indoor and outdoor aeroallergens were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Furthermore, individuals exposed to both indoor and outdoor allergens, and those exposed to them individually, were divided into three groups, and the changes in these groups over years, months, and genders were examined using a multiple multinomial logistic regression model. The adjusted effect sizes, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were presented in tabular form. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05, and analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Bulgular
    A total of 2,964 patients with at least one aeroallergen sensitization were included. Of these, 66.4% (n=1,970) were female. The mean age of the patients was 28.2 years (range 27–32). Indoor aeroallergen sensitization was identified in 78.3% of patients and outdoor aeroallergen sensitization was identified in 57.6%. The most common aeroallergens overall were Dermatophagoides farina (Df) (49.8%), Dp (48.1%), mixed mites (52.0%), and grass pollen (50.2%). Among outdoor aeroallergens, grass pollen sensitization was most frequent, while Alternaria and Cladosporium were the least common. Among indoor aeroallergens, house dust mites (Df, Dp, Dermamix) were the most common. Among tree pollens, olive tree pollen was the most frequent, followed by mixed tree pollens and birch pollen. Grass pollen was the most common among herbaceous pollens. Detailed aeroallergen distribution is presented in Table 1.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 1: Frequency of All Aeroallergens

    Among indoor aeroallergens, the number of monosensitized patients was 946 (31.9%), and the number of polysensitized patients was 1,362 (45.9%). Among outdoor aeroallergens, the number of monosensitized patients was 825 (27.8%), and the number of polysensitized patients was 913 (30.8%). The number of monosensitized and polysensitized patients was similar for outdoor aeroallergens (90.4%, 825/913).

    The prevalence of aeroallergens by year and the change in these prevalences over time are presented in Table 2. An examination of Table 2 reveals that the frequency of outdoor aeroallergens, particularly grass pollen, weed pollen, and olive tree pollen, was significantly lower in 2024 than in the other years. The frequency of cat aeroallergens was significantly lower in 2021 compared to the other three years (p=0.036).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 2: Distribution of aeroallergens by year and comparison between years

    The distribution of aeroallergens by month and the comparison results between months are presented in Table 3. When the table is evaluated, the frequency of indoor aeroallergens in June was significantly lower than in January, February, March, August, October, November, and December, and the frequency in May was also lower than in January, February, March, and December. Otherwise, the difference between months was not significant. Grass pollen aeroallergen frequency was significantly higher in June and September than in other months. Birch aeroallergen frequency was lowest in February and August and highest in July.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 3: The distribution of aeroallergens by month and the comparison results between months.

    The years were divided into 2021 COVID-19 period (during the lockdown) and the post-COVID-19 period. The distribution of aeroallergens across these periods is presented in Table 4. An examination of the table reveals that outdoor aeroallergen sensitization was significantly higher during the COVID-19 period (p=0.027), while cat aeroallergen sensitization was significantly higher after COVID-19 (p=0.016). Similarly, the frequency of dog, weed, Alternaria, and Aspergillus aeroallergens was significantly higher during the COVID-19 period.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 4: Distribution of aeroallergen frequency during and after COVID-19

    When the induration diameters for outdoor aeroallergens were compared, grass pollen was higher than other pollen aeroallergens.

    The distribution of aeroallergens by gender is shown in Table 5. When the table is examined, the frequency of outdoor aeroallergens was significantly higher in men.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 5: Distribution of aeroallergen frequency by gender

    Individuals with only indoor allergens and only outdoor allergens were compared to those with both allergen types, based on years, months, and genders. These factors were considered together in the model to determine their adjusted effects. (Table 6) The frequency of indoor allergens alone is significantly higher in women than in both cases; significantly higher in 2022, 2023, and 2024 than in 2021 and also significantly higher in January, February, March, April, May, October, November, and December than in June. However, no significant difference was found in other months compared to June.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 6: Results of multiple multinomial logistic regression

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Tartışma
    Our study showed that indoor sensitization is higher than outdoor sensitization in the Central Anatolia region, with house dust mite (Df) sensitization being the most common indoor aeroallergen, and grass mix sensitization being the most common outdoor aeroallergen. When we examined the distribution over the years, we observed that cat allergy has increased over the years, especially in the post-COVID-19 period.

    Climate, geography, and vegetation influence atmospheric aeroallergen content 3. An evaluation of 2,554 plant samples collected on Mount Erciyes between 1996 and 2002 identified 1170 species and subspecies taxa (1116 species, 31 subspecies, 23 variants) belonging to 89 families and 433 genera. The largest families in terms of the number of species and subspecies taxa are Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Poaceae 10.

    Poaceae pollen (grass pollen) is currently among the leading aeroallergens worldwide and is the primary cause of pollen allergy in most developed countries, particularly in North America and Europe 11. Consistent with global data, we observed the highest rate of sensitization to grass pollen among outdoor aeroallergens.

    Olea europaea pollen is a significant cause of respiratory allergic diseases in the Mediterranean region; olive pollen is a significant cause of pollinosis in Spain, Southern Italy, Greece, and Türkiye 12. Although Kayseri is not located in a coastal area, olive tree sensitization is significantly common 9. Our patients experienced sensitization in 32.8% of those tested with olive aeroallergen.

    Previous studies have shown an increase in the prevalence of both cat ownership and cat allergy during the COVID-19 period 13,14. Our study did not compare pre-COVID-19 with those during or after COVID-19, but consistent with the literature, we observed that the upward trend in cat sensitization continued even after the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns ended.

    Moreover, the frequency of outdoor aeroallergens was found to be higher in the pre-COVID-19 period, likely due to the impact of curfews, and this was similar to other studies conducted during the COVID-19 period (15, 16). The frequency of Dp aeroallergens was found to be significantly lower in 2024 and 2021 compared to 2022.

    When evaluated monthly, the frequency of indoor aeroallergens in June was significantly lower than in January, February, March, August, October, November, and December, and the frequency in May was lower than in January, February, March, and December. Several studies of allergic patients have reported higher rates of IgE sensitization to pollen or higher specific IgE (sIgE) levels during or after the pollen season 17. At the regional level, evidence suggests that sIgE for both grass and birch pollen varies seasonally (higher levels in spring and potentially higher levels in summer than winter) 18. Similarly, in our study, grass pollen aeroallergen sensitization peaked in June and birch aeroallergen sensitization peaked in July.

    The overall outdoor environment encompasses factors such as climate, biodiversity, and urban, social, and economic conditions that shape human interactions with the natural world 19. One notable health impact is the increase in allergic respiratory diseases triggered by increased atmospheric carbon dioxide and higher temperatures. These factors increase the concentration and aeroallergenicity of airborne particles such as pollen and fungal spores, leading to more severe symptoms 20. Higher temperatures before the pollen season have been associated with earlier pollen release 21. Furthermore, rain, wind, and sun may have contributed to the extension of the pollen season 22. There are studies indicating that grass and birch pollen seasons may be altered due to climate change, starting earlier and producing greater amounts 23,24. However, despite these findings, we have not found any evidence demonstrating the effect of changes in pollen release timing on the sensitization profile. Studies spanning many years are likely necessary to observe this effect.

    In patients with pollen monosensitization, symptoms persist only in the spring, while in patients with polysensitization, symptoms persist for several months or years 25. There are studies suggesting that monosensitization and polysensitization constitute two distinct phenotypes of AR, and polysensitization has been significantly associated with moderate to severe persistent AR 26. According to our data, the proportion of polysensitized patients was higher than that of monosensitized patients among those sensitized to both indoor and outdoor aeroallergens. However, because our clinic is located in a tertiary hospital, we believe that the higher proportion of polysensitized patients is likely due to the higher referral rate of patients with moderate and severe persistent rhinitis.

    Although previous studies have shown no association between induration diameter and clinical symptoms 27,28, we observed grass pollen diameter was significantly higher than other pollen aeroallergens.

    Our study is valuable because it covers a total of 4 years, including a high patient participation rate, and especially data from the COVID-19 period, when people spent more time indoors. Aeroallergen sensitization was evaluated not only in patients residing in Kayseri province but also in other cities in Central Anatolia. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, detailed clinical findings and comorbidities of the patients could not be evaluated. Furthermore, due to seasonal variations in the brands and types of aeroallergen solutions provided by the institution, not all aeroallergens could be applied to all patients.

    The diversity of our findings suggests that aeroallergen protection measures can be developed based on regional sensitization differences. In the coming years, there is a need for studies with wider participation, which will map detailed aeroallergen sensitization, especially pollen, according to the geographical characteristics of Türkiye.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Kaynaklar

    1) Türkiye Ulusal Allerji ve Klinik İmmünoloji Derneği Alerjik-Rinit-Tani-ve-Tedavi-Rehberi https://www.aid.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Alerjik-Rinit-Tani-ve-Tedavi-Rehberi-2022-web-vers4.pdf

    2) Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C, et al. Allergic rhinitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020; 6(1): 95.

    3) Jo EJ, Eom JS, Mok J, et al. Patterns of sensitization to aeroallergens and their effect on airway hyper-responsiveness in Busan, Korea. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2021; 39(3): 182-189.

    4) Tantilipikorn P, Pinkaew B, Talek K, et al. Pattern of allergic sensitization in chronic rhinitis: A 19-year retrospective study. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2021; 39(3): 156-162.

    5) Valero A, Justicia JL, Antón E, et al. Epidemiology of allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen or house-dust mites in Spain. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011; 25(4): e123-128.

    6) Erel F, Karaayvaz M, Calişkaner Z, Ozangüç N. The aeroallergen spectrum in Turkey and the relationships between aeroallergens and age, sex, birth month, birthplace, blood groups and family history of atopy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1998; 8(4): 226-233.

    7) İğde M, İğde FA, Sancak R, Öztürk F. Orta Karadeniz Bölgesindeki çocuklarda allerji deri testi sonuçları. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Pediatrics. 2009;18(2):82-90.

    8) Bilgir F, Uzum Y, Balikci O, Korkmaz UB, Dede B. Aeroallergen sensitivity in patients with allergic respiratory tract symptoms in Izmir and its Environs, Aegean Region of Turkey. Asthma Allergy Immunol 2023; 21: 120-127

    9) Kökoğlu K, Kutlu Ö. Kayseri ilinde alerjik rinit hastalarının ve deri prick testi sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. KBB Uygulamaları 2020; 8(3): 137-144.

    10) Kayseri İl Çevre Durum Raporu 2013, page 48 https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/editordosya/Kayseri_icdr2013.pdf

    11) D'Amato G, Cecchi L, Bonini S, et al. Aeroallergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy 2007; 62: 976-990.

    12) Bousquet J, Guérin B, Hewitt B, Lim S, Michel FB. Allergy in the Mediterranean area. III: Cross reactivity among Oleaceae pollens. Clin Allergy 1985; 15(5): 439-448.

    13) Evcen R, Çölkesen F, Yıldız E et al. Increasing Prevalence of Sensitization to Cat/Dog Aeroallergens in the COVID 19-19 Pandemic. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2024; 185(2): 133-141.

    14) Arslan B, Çetin GP, Yilmaz İ. Genetic predisposition and increased environmental aeroallergen exposure in cat allergy: The pandemic is a very good example. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2025; 53(3): 1-7.

    15) Yang X, Zhang J, Sima Y, et al. A multicenter time series study on pollen exposure and COVID 19-19 infection in five cities in China. Allergy 2023; 78(6): 1711-1713.

    16) Sözener ZÇ, Öztürk BÖ, Aydın Ö, et al. Coincidence of pollen season and coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: less time dış-ortams - lesser allergy symptoms in 2020. Asia Pac Allergy 2021; 11(2): e16

    17) Sin BA, Inceoglu O, Mungan D, et al. Is it important to perform pollen skin prick tests in the season? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2001; 86: 382-386.

    18) Lam HCY, Jarvis D. ECRHS I Investigators. Seasonal variation in total and pollen-specific immunoglobulin E levels in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 51(8): 1085-1088.

    19) Wild, C.P. The exposome: From concept to utility. Int J Epidemiol 2012; 41: 24-32.

    20) Ziska LH. An Overview of rising CO2 and climatic change on aeroallergens and allergic diseases. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2020; 12: 771-782.

    21) Manangan A, Brown C, Saha S, et al. Long-term pollen trends and associations between pollen phenology and seasonal climate in Atlanta, Georgia (1992-2018). Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 127(4): 471-480.

    22) Lo F, Bitz CM, Battisti DS, Hess JJ. Pollen calendars and maps of aeroallergenic pollen in North America. Aerobiologia 2019; 35(4): 613-633.

    23) Ziska LH, Makra L, Harry SK, et al. Temperature-related changesin airborne aeroallergenic pollen abundance and seasonality across thenorthern hemisphere: A retrospective data analysis. Lancet Planet Heal. 2019; 3: e124-e131.

    24) Barnes CS. Impact of climate change on pollen and respiratory disease. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2018; 18: 59.

    25) Gerth van Wijk R, Smits HH. Heterogeneity in allergic rhinitis: Explained by inducible mechanistic traits? J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 148(2): 358-360

    26) Asha’ari ZA, Yusof S, Ismail R, Che Hussin CM. Clinical features of allergic rhinitis and skin prick test analysis based on the ARIA classification: A preliminary study in Malaysia. Ann Acad Med Singap 2010; 39: 619-624.

    27) Madani S, Zandieh F, Ahmadi M, Parvizi M, Rezaei N. Does the reaction size of skin prick test associated with the allergic rhinitis symptom severity? Allergologia et Immunopathologia 2021; 49: 60.

    28) Ryll LS, Rohlfing ML, Rubin SJ, et al. A prospective analysis of allergy skin‐prick test wheal size association with symptom severity. In International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology,2021,Oct;11(10):1501-1503

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
    [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]