[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi
2022, Cilt 36, Sayı 2, Sayfa(lar) 134-139
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
Pnömonili Sığırların Burun Boşluklarında Bulunan Bakteriyel Patojenlerin MALDI TOF MS ile İdentifikasyonu
Pelin Fatoş POLAT DİNÇER1, Zeynep YERLİKAYA2, Burcu KARAGÜLLE2
1Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, İzmir, TÜRKİYE
2Fırat University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Elazığ, TÜRKİYE
Anahtar Kelimeler: MALDI-MS, sığır, solunum, pnömoni
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı, pnömonili sığırlarda MALDI-TOF MS kullanarak nazal kavitede bulunan patojenlerin etiyolojik spektrumunu belirlemektir. Çalışma materyalini İzmir'in farklı ilçelerinden 24 ayrı çiftlikten pnömoni semptomu gösteren 2 ile 7 yaş arasında 64 sığır, 30 ile 85 günlük yaştaki 39 buzağı ve 20 sağlıklı sığır ve buzağı oluşturdu. Tüm hayvanların klinik muayeneleri yapıldıktan sonra kömürlü amies transport besiyerli svap kullanılarak nazal numune alındı. Yapılan klinik muayene de solunum frekansı, kalp frekansı ve rektal sıcaklık pnömoni semptomu gösteren vakalarda kontrole göre istatistiksel olarak yüksek (<0.001) tespit edildi. MALDI-TOF MS ile sığır numunelerinden 17 farklı bakteri izole edildi. Sırasıyla; Escherichia coli (E. coli) (% 32.8), Staphylococcus lentus (S. lentus) (% 28.1), Staphylococcus sciuri (S. sciuri) (% 21.8) en fazla izole edilen patojenler oldu. Buzağılardan ise 13 farklı bakteri izole edildi. Sırasıyla; E. coli (% 46.1), S. lentus (% 41), Staphylococcus xylosus (S. xylosus) ve S. sciuri (% 7.6) en fazla izole edilen bakteriler oldu. Mycoplasma izolasyonu ve moleküler karakterizasyonu için ise PCR yapıldı. Sığır ve buzağılardan alınan örneklerin 29'unda Mycoplasma spp. 24'ünde ise Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) izole edildi. M. bovis ile mix enfeksiyon yapan etkenlerden en fazla S. sciuri (% 12.5) ve E. coli (% 12.5) tespit edildi. Bu bulgular bölgemizdeki pnömoni etkenlerinin spektrumunu ortaya koyarken, MALDI-TOF MS ile burun boşluğundaki patojenlerin hızlı ve güvenilir bir şekilde tespit edilebileceğini göstermektedir.
  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Giriş
    Respiratory system diseases, which are the most important global problem in cattle breeding, cause serious economic losses due to high morbidity and mortality 1. Respiratory system diseases in cattle and calves are affected by type of microorganism, environmental factors, and individual immunity. While many bacteria are the primary cause of the disease, it may also be caused by many secondary factors 2. It is also etiologically complex because early weaning, poor transport, crowded, stuffy or unsuitable shelters, sudden climate changes, stress, and many microorganisms influence the disease’s emergence. Respiratory diseases cause annual losses of approximately 800-900 million dollars in the United States alone while treatment costs around 15.57 dollars per animal 3,4. While the incidence of respiratory system diseases in our country varies between 22-59.7%, it has been reported that 50-70% of the deaths in beef cattle are caused by the respiratory system 1,5.

    Four sampling techniques are commonly used for antemortem diagnosis of pathogens in cattle with respiratory disease: nasal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, bronchoalveolar lavage, and transtracheal wash 6. If more than one sampling is required then nasal swabs are preferred to nasopharyngeal swabs because they are cheaper. In addition, for nasopharyngeal swabs, auxiliary elements are needed to restrain the animal while the process stresses the animal 7. Mcdaneld et al. analyzed the microbiome of nasal cavity samples from cattle with respiratory tract disease complex using a nasopharyngeal swab and a 6-inch swab (approximately 150 mm). They reported that both swabs gave similar results 7. Doyle et al. evaluated all four sampling techniques. They detected similar respiratory tract pathogens from nasal swabs and deep nasopharyngeal swabs in calves diagnosed with bovine respiratory system disease 6. Fast and accurate diagnosis of the causative agent is as important as taking samples. Respiratory pathogens in animals are detected by sampling culture and susceptibility testing. However, because diagnosis takes at least 48 hours, most antimicrobial infection treatments rely on experience-based antibiotic selection. Thus, it is critical to obtain rapid and accurate microbiological results to use antimicrobials correctly in treating respiratory tract infections. Accurate and rapid diagnosis is associated with the use of appropriate antibiotics and quicker patient recovery 8. Various studies have shown that matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a very valuable diagnostic method that produces satisfactory results. MALDI-TOF MS identifies gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi with 90-100% agreement with the reference method 9. Nevertheless, despite the widespread use of modern herd management, vaccination programs, improved diagnostic techniques, and antibiotic treatments, yield and animal losses due to pneumonia continue 10.

    This study used MALDI-TOF MS to identify the etiological spectrum of common pathogens in the nasal cavity of cattle and calves. This method provides accurate and rapid diagnosis in cattle and calves with respiratory system disease, thereby supporting greater awareness in use of antibiotics.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Materyal ve Metot
    Research and Publication Ethics: Before starting the study, ethical approval was obtained from Dokuz Eylul University University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee, dated 02.03.2022, decision number 11/2022.

    The study material consisted of 64 cows aged between 2 and 7 years and 39 calves aged between 30 and 85 days. Nasal swabs were taken after clinical examination (respiration rate, heart rate, rectal temperature) for each calf and cows showing pneumonia symptoms (cough, fever, nasal discharge, respiratory distress) from 24 different farms in various districts of Izmir, Turkey. The control group consisted of 20 healthy dairy cows and 20 calves. An Amies transport media with charcoal (Transwab Pernasal, MW173C, Medical Wire & Equip. Co. Ltd, UK) were used to collect the nasal swab samples, which were sent to Fırat University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology for agent isolation under appropriate transport conditions. The samples were stored at -20 °C until analyzed.

    Bacterial Isolation and Identification with MALDI TOF MS: For isolation, the samples were directly inoculated on blood agar with 5% sheep blood and incubated for 24-48 hours at 37°C in an aerobic environment. The colonies grown on the plates were then purified separately and typified using MALDI-TOF MS database v2.0 system (bioMerieux, France). The bacteria included in the typing were 99.9% similar to the bacterial names.

    Mycoplasma Isolation and Molecular Characterization: For mycoplasma isolation from swabs, selective Mycoplasma broth and Mycoplasma agar were inoculated first. To avoid broth contamination, samples were diluted up to 10-4 and incubated in an oven with 5% CO2 for three weeks. Typical mycoplasma colonies were identified by examining the agars under a stereomicroscope. Passages were then made from the broth with the last turbidity observed. The agar colonies grown were passaged three times before being put into sterile tubes with 50% mycoplasma broth and 50% horse serum, and stored at -20oC for genomic DNA extraction. Genomic DNA extraction with phenol and chloroform was performed on the isolates from the mycoplasma agar and broths 11. Target DNAs were first validated with Mycoplasma genus-specific primers before PCR analysis using primers specific for M. bovis, M. alkalescens, M. arginini, M. dispar, M. bovirhinis, and M. canis (Table 1). Then, PCR amplification was performed using separate protocols for each genomic DNA 12-17. A result of agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products were evaluated.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 1: Primer pairs used in PCR analyses

    Statistical Analysis: Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22. The variables were investigated using both visual (histograms, probability plots) and analytical methods (Kolmogorov-Simirnov) to determine whether or not they were normally distributed. The Student’s t-test was used to compare respiratory rate, heart rate and rectal temperature levels between groups. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the microbial isolation rates from the samples. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as a statistically significant result 18.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Bulgular
    The clinical examination of all animals included in the study showed that respiratory rate, heart rate, and rectal temperature were statistically higher (<0.001) in cases with pneumonia symptoms than control animals (Table 2). Regarding the 64 cows showing pneumonia symptoms, MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the nasal swabs isolated 17 different bacteria species. The most frequent were E. coli (32.8%), S. lentus (28.1%), and S. sciuri (21.8%). Similarly, 11 different bacteria were isolated from calves, with most frequent being E. coli (46.1%), S. lentus (41.0%), S. xylosus (7.6%) and S. sciuri (7.6%) (Table 3). The rates of polymicrobial isolation were 61% in cows and 58.3% in calves (Table 4). Mycoplasma spp were detected in 29 of 103 samples from cows and calves. Regarding mycoplasma genus, the PCR analysis indicated that 24 of 29 samples were M. bovis, while 5 could not be typed. No positivity was found for M.alkalescens, M.arginini, M.dispar, M.bovirhinis, or M.canis in any of the DNAs that were positive for Mycoplasma spp. S. sciuri and E. coli (12.5%) caused the most mixed infections with M. bovis while E. coli (20.8%) was found in calves (Table 5).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 2: Clinical findings of cows and calves showing symptoms of pneumonia


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 3: The results of the detection of different pathogens in 103 nasal swabs samples collected from cows and calves with respiratory disease by MALDI-TOF MS


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 4: Microbial isolation rates from samples


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table 5: Coinfection of M. bovis in Cow and calves

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Tartışma
    Respiratory diseases are one of the most leading problems in animals worldwide. Especially in cattle, they damage cattle industry and national economies by decreasing feeding efficiency and weight gain, and causing death in severe cases. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of the disease is thus critical to ensure animal health and welfare, reduce losses, and enable effective treatment and positive prognosis 19. Studies of bacterial isolation from slaughterhouse material 1,20 and nasal cavities of healthy and ill cattle have been conducted in Turkey before 21-23. However, our study is the first to obtain data using nasal swabs obtained from cows with pneumonia using the MALDITOF MS.

    In the present study, we performed clinical examinations of both the animals showing pneumonia symptoms and control-healthy animals. The clinical measurements (respiratory rate, heart rate, and rectal temperature) were higher in cows and calves showing pneumonia symptoms than control group animals and reference values 24. Hanzlicek et al. endoscopically infected calves with Mannheimia haemolytica and also detected changes from physical examination. While clinical measurements (respiratory rate, heart rate, and rectal temperature) varied in the following days, there were a general increase compared to reference values 25. Similarly, Van Donkersgoed et al. conducted an epidemiological study of enzootic pneumonia in calves. They reported an increase in respiratory rate and rectal temperature in pneumonia cases 26.

    MALDI-TOF MS has gained popularity in recent years because it enables precise and rapid (i.e. on the same-day), species-level identification of microorganisms isolated from blood, urine, peritoneal, synovial, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, body fluids like cerebrospinal, and from many sources (e.g., slaughterhouse material) 27. Van Driessche et al. used MALDI-TOF MS to determine the etiological spectrum of bacteria isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. They identified 45 different bacterial species from 100 samples. Furthermore, compared to traditional bacterial culturing to detect pathogens in the lower respiratory tract, they reported that this method reduced the diagnostic time from 24-48 hours to an average of 6.5 hours and gave more accurate results 28. Choudhary et al. applied MALDI-TOF to nasal swabs, tracheal swabs, and lung tissue samples from cattle and buffalo. They identified major pneumonia pathogens, such as Pasteurella spp, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (3.1%), S. sciuri (0.79%), E. coli (20.63%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.3%), and Enterobacter cloacae (3.1%) while 96% of samples were polymicrobial 29. Using the same method, our study isolated 19 different bacterial species from 103 samples. The most frequent bacterial species were E. coli (37.8%), S. lentus (33%), Mycoplasma spp. (28.1%), S. sciuri (16.5%), E. cloacae (10.6%), and S. maltophilia (2.91%). Polymicrobial isolation was observed in 60% of samples.

    Because the bovine respiratory tract acts as a reservoir for pathogenic microorganisms, poor hygiene conditions, stress factors, and climate changes may trigger mixed infections in the lungs. In particular, some Staphylococcus spp. and E. coli induced pneumonias are thought to develop in this way 30. Our study detected high rates of S. lentus, S. sciuri, and E. coli. The first two of these are generally isolated from domestic, farm, and wild animals, and foods of animal origin. Hay et al. were the first to isolate S. lentus from the sinonasal cavity as a sinusitis agent, although it is under reported in humans 31. In humans, this bacterium causes serious infections, such as endocarditis, peritonitis, septic shock, endophthalmitis, pelvic inflammatory diseases, and wound infections 32. The fact that this bacterium was isolated at high rates in our study suggests that the sampled animals had sinusitis in addition to pneumonia symptoms.

    In recent years, it has been reported that caseonecrotic bronchopneumonia, a type of pneumonia characterized by chronic mycoplasma infection, is caused by M. bovis, which is more virulent than other mycoplasma species 33. In bovine respiratory system diseases, more than 70% of Mycoplasma spp pneumonia cases are generally seen as mixed infections, with only 20% reported as solitary 34,35. Booker et al. identified microbiological agents in respiratory system diseases of beef cattle and investigated the relationship between these agents and pathological processes. It was found that 12/15 (80%) of animals positive for Histophilus somni were also positive for M. bovis 34. The prevalence of M. bovis in Denmark increased from 0.6% in 1983 36 to 2% in 1999 37 and 24% in the 2000s 38. Kusiluka et al. investigated the prevalence of mycoplasmas in pneumonic cattle lungs. They found that the most dominant (72.0%) mycoplasma species and Ureaplasma spp while 18.6% of samples had mixed M. bovis Ureaplasma infection 38. Soehnlen et al. reported a positivity rate for M. bovis as 40% from nasal swabs 39. Our study detected M. bovis in 23% of 103 animals while all samples with M. bovis also contained other bacteria. No bacterial growth was observed in the isolation performed on blood agar from samples containing the five Mycoplasma spp. Thus, the probability that suspected animals have mixed infections with M. bovis is around 80%. Bacterial identification using the isolation method from lower respiratory tract samples is the gold standard for diagnosing Mycoplasma induced pneumonia. Thomas et al. compared the isolation rates in different samples collected from cattle with clinical signs and reported much higher isolation rates from BAL fluids than nasal swabs 40. We could not take lower respiratory tract samples becuase the method is invasive, requires skilled extra labor and equipment, and, more importantly, is not acceptable by the animal owners. Karahan et al. examined a total of 148 samples (3 lung, 4 eye swab, 51 nasal swab, 90 milk) and found 23.5% positivity for M. bovis in nasal swabs 11. Akan et al. found 16 (12.5%) of 127 nasal swabs positive for M. bovis by PCR 41. In our study, the isolation rate for Mycoplasma spp. was 9.7% (10/103), which was quite low compared to the 28.1% (29/103) positivity rate according to the PCR analysis. Possible causes include the lengthy transport of samples after collection, freezing until processing, and using nasal swabs. This may also explain why five Mycoplasma spp. could not be typed due to the presence of contaminant bacterial and yeast DNA in their extracted DNA.

    In conclusion, pneumonia is a common problem in dairy cattle and calves that harms animal welfare and causes significant economic losses every year. It has been a universal problem since the beginning of farm animal husbandry. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are as important as prophylactic measures for this disease. In our study, the samples were collected and the bacteria detected accurately and quickly using MALDI-TOF MS. This method is easy to apply in the field and causes minimal discomfort to the animals. The method successfully demonstrated in our study can contribute to preventing antibiotic resistance in both animals and humans by enabling the correct use of antibiotics and will contribute positively to the field.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Kaynaklar

    1) Bulut İ. Sığır pnömonilerinin patolojik ve bakteriyolojik yöntemler ile araştırılması. Yüksek lisans tezi, Balıkesir: Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2019.

    2) Bellinghausen C, Rohde GGU, Savelkoul PHM, Wouters EFM, Stassen FRM. Viral–bacterial interactions in the respiratory tract. J Gen Virol 2016; 97: 3089-3102.

    3) Chirase NK, Greene LW. Dietary Zinc and Manganese Sources Administered from the Fetal Stage Onwards Affect Immune Response of Transit Stressed and Virus Infected Offspring Steer Calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001; 93: 217-228.

    4) Lorenz I, Earley B, Gilmore J, et al. Calf health from birth to weaning. III. housing and management of calf pneumonia. Ir Vet J 2011; 64: 1-9.

    5) Alkan F, Özkul A, Karaoğlu MT, et al. Sığırlarda viral nedenli solunum sistemi enfeksiyonlarının seroepidemiyolojisi. AÜ Vet Fak Derg 1997; 44: 1-8.

    6) Doyle D, Credille B, Lehenbauer TW, et al. Agreement among 4 sampling methods to identify respiratory pathogens in dairy calves with acute bovine respiratory disease. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 31: 954-959.

    7) McDaneld TG, Kuehn LA, Keele JW. Evaluating the microbiome of two sampling locations in the nasal cavity of cattle with bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC). Sci J Anim Sci 2018; 4: 1281-1287.

    8) Mok JH, Eom JS, Jo EJ, et al. Clinical utility of rapid pathogen identification using matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry in ventilated patients with pneumonia: A pilot study. Respirology 2016; 21: 321-328.

    9) Kassim A, Pflüger V, Premji Z, Daubenberger C, Revathi G. Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast. BMC microbiology 2017; 1: 1-8.

    10) Storz J, Purdy CW, Lin XQ, et al. Isolation of respiratory coronaviruses, other cytocidal viruses and Pasteurella spp from cattle involved in two natural outbreaks of shipping fever. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216: 1599-1604.

    11) Karahan M, Kalin R, Atil E, Çetinkaya B. Detection of Mycoplasma bovis in cattle with mastitis and respiratory problems in eastern Turkey. Vet Rec 2010; 26: 827.

    12) Wong-Lee JG, Lovett M. Rapid and sensitive PCR method for identification of Mycoplasma species in tissue culture. Diagnostic Molecular and Microbiology Principles and Applications. Washington DC: mBio 1993; 257-260.

    13) Foddai A, Idini G, Fusco M, et al. Rapid differential diagnosis of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis based on a multiplex-PCR and a PCR-RFLP. Mol Cell Probe 2005, 3: 207-212.

    14) Nicholas R, Ayling R, McAuliffe L. Mycoplasma diseases of ruminants. 1st Edition, Surrey: UK, 2008.

    15) Kobayashı H, Hırose K, Worarach A, et al. In vitro amplification of the 16S rRNA genes from Mycoplasma bovirhinis, Mycoplasma alkalescens and Mycoplasma bovigenitalium by PCR. J Vet Med Sci 1998; 12: 1299-1303.

    16) Timenetsky J, Santos LM, Buzinhani M, Mettifogo E. Detection of multiple mycoplasma infection in cell cultures by PCR. Braz J Med Bıol Res 2006; 39: 907-914.

    17) Miles K, McAuliffe L, Ayling RD, Nicholas RA. Rapid detection of Mycoplasma dispar and M. bovirhinis using allele specific polymerase chain reaction protocols. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004; 1: 103-107.

    18) Hayran M, Hayran M. Sağlık Araştırmaları İçin Temel İstatistik. 1. Baskı, Azim Matbaacılık: Ankara, 2018.

    19) Friton GM, Cajal C, Ramirez-Romero R. Longterm effects of meloxicam in the treatment of respiratory disease in fattening cattle. Vet Rec 2005; 156: 809-811.

    20) İssi M, Eröksüz Y, Öngör H, ve ark. Enzootik pnömoni semptomları görülen bir besi sığırı işletmesinde Mycoplasma bovis enfeksiyonu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 2015; 10: 39-45.

    21) Eskin Z. Sağlıklı sığırların nazal boşluk bakteriyel florasının moleküler identifikasyonu. Yüksek lisans tezi, Aydın: Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2012.

    22) Özçelik M, İssi M, Güler O, et al. Bakteriyel pnömonili besi sığırlarında oluşan serbest radikal hasarının antioksidan aktivite ve bazı mineral maddeler üzerine etkisi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2014; 11: 111-116.

    23) Tuzcu M, Tuzcu N, Başbuğ O. Pathological, cytological, microbiological and molecular investigations of pneumonia caused by Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica. EJVS 2020; 36: 331-339.

    24) Kahn CM, Line S. The Merck Veterinary Manual.10th Edition, Elsevier Health Sciences: UK, 2010.

    25) Hanzlicek GA, White BJ, Mosier D, Renter DG, Anderson DE. Serial evaluation of physiologic, pathological, and behavioral changes related to disease progression of experimentally induced Mannheimia haemolytica pneumonia in postweaned calves. Am J Vet Res 2010; 3: 359-369.

    26) Van Donkersgoed J, Ribble CS, Boyer LG, Townsend HG. Epidemiological study of enzootic pneumonia in dairy calves in Saskatchewan. Can J Vet Res 1993; 57: 247-254.

    27) Ovia M, RodrÝguez-Sßnchez B, Gˇmara M. Direct identification of clinical pathogens from liquid culture media by MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 6: 624-629.

    28) Van Driessche L, Bokma J, Deprez P, et al. Rapid identification of respiratory bacterial pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in cattle by MALDI-TOF MS. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 1-8.

    29) Choudhary M, Choudhary BK, Ghosh RC, et al. Cultivable microbiota and pulmonary lesions in polymicrobial bovine pneumonia. Microb Pathog 2019; 134: 103577.

    30) Sedeek SR, Thabet AER. Some studies on bacterial causes of pneumonia in cattle in Assiut Governorate. Assiut Vet Med J 2001; 45: 243-255.

    31) Hay CY, Sherris DA. Staphylococcus lentus sinusitis: a new sinonasal pathogen. Ear, Nose & Throat J 2020; 99: 62-63.

    32) Rivera M, Dominguez MD, Mendiola NR, Roso GR, Quereda C. Staphylococcus lentus peritonitis: a case report. Perit Dial Int 2014; 4: 469-470.

    33) Shahriar FM, Clark EG, Janzen E, West K, Wobeser G. Coinfection with bovine viral diarrhea virus and Mycoplasma bovis in feedlot cattle with chronic pneumonia. Can Vet J 2002; 43: 863-868.

    34) Booker CW, Abutarbush SM, Morley PS, et al. Microbiological and histopathological findings in cases of fatal bovine respiratory disease of feedlot cattle in western Canada. Can Vet J 2008; 49: 473-481.

    35) Panciera RJ, Confer AW. Pathogenesis and pathology of bovine pneumonia. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2010; 26: 191-214.

    36) Friis NF, Krogh HV. Isolation of mycoplasma from Danish cattle. Nord Vet Med 1983; 35: 74-81.

    37) Tegtmeier C, Uttenthal C, Friis NF, Jensen NE, Jensen, HE. Pathological and microbiological studies on pneumonic lungs from Danish calves. Vet Med B 1999; 46: 693-700.

    38) Kusıluka LJM, Ojenıyı B, Frııs NF. Increasing prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis in Danish cattle. Acta Vet Scand. 2000; 41: 139-146.

    39) Soehnlen MK, Aydin A, Murthy KS. Epidemiology of Mycoplasma bovis in Pennsylvania veal calves. Int J Dairy Sci 2012; 1: 247-254.

    40) Thomas A, Dizier I, Trolin A, Mainil J, Linden A. Comparison of sampling procedures for isolating pulmonary mycoplasmas in cattle. Vet Res Commun 2002; 5: 333-339.

    41) Akan M, Babacan O, Torun E, Müştak HK, Öncel T. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma bovis infection in cattle by ELISA and PCR. Kafkas Üni Vet Fak Derg 2014; 20: 249-252.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
    [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]